Industry
Clinical software has to be right, auditable, and usable by someone mid-shift.
Care coordination, intake and scheduling, built with the compliance constraints treated as architecture rather than a checklist at the end.
Failure patterns
What goes wrong here specifically
Not generic software problems. These are the ones that recur in this sector.
Compliance retrofitted is compliance rebuilt
Audit logging, access control and retention are schema-level decisions. Added after launch, they touch everything and delay the deal that triggered them.
Integration means HL7 or FHIR, or neither
Standards exist and adherence varies wildly by vendor. The integration surface is the risk in most clinical builds, and it is rarely scoped honestly.
The user is busy and interrupted
Software used mid-shift by someone with four other things happening cannot be designed for an unhurried demo.
What we build
Systems we have shipped in this space
- Care coordination and patient tracking tools
- Intake and triage flows with structured capture
- Scheduling that models real clinical constraints
- Audit logging designed in from the schema
- Integrations with clinical systems where the API is genuinely usable
{{TODO: VERTICALS}} — no published case study in healthcare yet — this list describes capability, not evidence, and the page stays unindexed until that changes
Constraints
The rules this sector plays by
Compliance, data handling and integration reality. These are architecture decisions, not a checklist at the end.
HIPAA and equivalents
Access control, audit trails, encryption at rest and in transit, and business associate agreements. Load-bearing, and cheap only if designed in from the start.
Data residency
Where records physically live, which varies by market and sometimes by contract.
Clinical safety
There is a line between administrative tooling and anything influencing a clinical decision. We stay firmly on the administrative side of it.
Related work
Nothing published here yet
An industry page with no evidence is worse than not having the page, so this one does not borrow case studies from another sector to fill the gap. When there is work to show here, it appears in this slot.
{{TODO: VERTICALS}} — at least one cleared case study in this vertical before publication
FAQ
Questions people actually ask
Are you HIPAA compliant?
Compliance belongs to the covered entity, not to a contractor, and any vendor claiming otherwise is telling you something imprecise. We build to the technical controls it requires and sign a BAA.
Can you integrate with our EHR?
Depends entirely on the vendor and the contract. Some expose a workable FHIR API, some expose a flat file overnight, and we will find out which you have before quoting rather than after.
Do you build anything clinical-facing?
Administrative and coordination tooling, yes. Anything that could influence a clinical decision needs a regulatory pathway and a different kind of team, and we will say so.
Do you have healthcare work we can see?
Nothing published in this vertical. We are not going to imply domain evidence we cannot show.